A Biblical Look at the Regulative and Normative Principles
How should the church worship God? For centuries, this question has been a source of passionate debate. At the heart of this discussion is a concept known as the Regulative Principle of Worship (RPW). What is this principle, is it found in Scripture, or is it a tradition based on a misunderstanding of God’s covenants?
This question is not about whether God changes—He does not. It is about understanding His unchanging character through the lens of progressive revelation, recognizing that the way He commanded His people to approach Him has developed throughout redemptive history.
What is the Regulative Principle?
In its simplest form, the Regulative Principle of Worship states that the church in its corporate worship service must only do what is explicitly commanded or prescribed in Scripture. If the Bible does not command it for worship, it is forbidden. The heart of this principle is a sincere and admirable desire to worship God only on His terms, protecting the church from human inventions.
A Closer Look at the Key Verses
Proponents of the Regulative Principle rightly want to worship God on His terms, and they point to several key passages to support their view. However, when we examine these texts in their proper context, we find that they teach something different than the strict principle often derived from them.
1. Deuteronomy 12:32
The Text: “ Be careful to do everything I command you; do not add anything to it or take anything away from it.“
The Regulative Argument: This verse is often presented as a timeless, universal command that forbids adding any element to worship that is not explicitly commanded in Scripture.
A Contextual Exegesis: The immediate context of Deuteronomy 12 is crucial. God is instructing the Israelites on how to worship Him when they enter Canaan. The entire chapter is a warning against adopting the idolatrous, pagan practices of the nations they are dispossessing. The command to “not add or take away” is specifically about rejecting syncretism—mixing the worship of Yahweh with the worship of false gods. It is not an abstract, trans-covenantal rule forbidding every non-prescribed element in a church service.
2. Leviticus 10:1-3 & Exodus 30:9
The Texts: In Leviticus 10, Nadab and Abihu offer “unauthorized fire before the LORD, which he had not commanded them to do.” Similarly, in Exodus 30:9, the priests are commanded regarding the altar of incense: “You must not offer unauthorized incense on it, or a burnt or grain offering; you are not to pour a drink offering on it.”
The Regulative Argument: The key is the word “unauthorized” (or “strange”). This is used to argue that if God does not explicitly command an element of worship (like a specific incense formula or type of fire), it is unauthorized and therefore forbidden.
A Contextual Exegesis: Both events are tied directly to the highly specific regulations of the Tabernacle worship system under the Old Covenant. God had just given extremely detailed commands about the priestly duties, the holy fire for the altar, and the precise, sacred recipe for the incense. The sin in both cases was not mere creative innovation; it was a flagrant act of disobedience and irreverence, violating God’s direct and explicit commands in the most holy place on earth. The lesson is about God’s terrifying holiness and the danger of disobeying His specific instructions within a temporary, ceremonial system, not a universal principle about elements on which Scripture is silent in the New Covenant.
3. Colossians 2:20-23
The Text: Paul warns against submitting to regulations like “Don’t handle, Don’t taste, Don’tt touch!” which are based on “human commands and teachings” and are a form of “self-made religion.”
The Regulative Argument: Proponents argue that adding uncommanded elements to worship is a form of “self-made religion” based on human tradition.
A Contextual Exegesis: Paul is arguing against the Colossian heresy, a form of legalistic asceticism where burdensome human rules were being added as a means of achieving salvation or a higher spirituality. This passage is a powerful warning against legalism, not a prohibition of biblically-sound, non-essential elements in a worship service.
A Misunderstanding of the Covenants?
The strict application of the RPW often rests on a misunderstanding of the covenants and the crucial difference between Old Testament Israel and the New Testament church.
The laws given at Sinai were part of a specific covenant for a specific people for a specific time. They were a theocratic nation under the law. The Law, as a unified whole, governed every aspect of their national life and worship, serving as a shadow pointing to the reality that was to come in Christ (Hebrews 10:1).
However, the New Covenant is different. Christ is our temple, our high priest, and our perfect sacrifice. The wall of division, with its regulations, has been torn down (Ephesians 2:14). The New Testament gives us the core elements of worship—the preaching of the Word, prayer, singing, and the ordinances—but it does not provide the exhaustive detail the Old Testament did. It gives us the “what,” but offers significant freedom in the “how.”
Biblical Support for the Normative Principle
A biblically balanced approach to worship—the Normative Principle—is also grounded in the teachings of the New Testament. This principle, which states that whatever is not forbidden is permitted as long as it is edifying and orderly, finds its support in the themes of Christian liberty and principled guidance.
1. Romans 14:1-6
The Text: “As for the one who is weak in faith, welcome him, but not to quarrel over opinions… Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind.”
The Normative Argument: This passage establishes a clear principle of Christian liberty in non-essential matters (food, special days). Paul’s solution is not a new rulebook but a call for charity and personal conviction, allowing for freedom where Scripture has not given a direct command.
2. 1 Corinthians 14:26 & 40
The Text: “When you come together, each one has a hymn, a lesson… Let all things be done for building up… But all things should be done decently and in order.”
The Normative Argument: In this key chapter on corporate worship, Paul does not give an exhaustive, exclusive list of what can be done. Instead, he provides two guiding principles: is it edifying (“for building up”) and is it orderly? This strongly supports the idea that the New Testament provides guiding principles rather than a detailed, regulative script.
3. Galatians 5:1
The Text: “For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery.”
The Normative Argument: This verse is a powerful summary of the gospel’s liberating power. The “yoke of slavery” refers to any man-made rule that is added to Scripture and made binding on the conscience of believers, a danger a strict application of the Regulative Principle can sometimes pose.
4. Colossians 3:16
The Text: “Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly, teaching and admonishing one another in all wisdom, singing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, with thankfulness in your hearts to God.”
The Normative Argument: This passage does not provide a restrictive, exclusive list of what songs to sing. Instead, it offers three broad and likely overlapping categories for musical worship: Psalms (from the Old Testament), Hymns (newly composed songs of praise to Christ), and Spiritual Songs (testimonies and truths prompted by the Spirit). This implies a breadth and freedom in the church’s musical expression, guided by the principles that it must be rooted in the “word of Christ” and offered with thankfulness.
Conclusion: A Better Way Forward
The Regulative Principle, in its strictest form, often forces the church to misapply Old Testament laws intended for national Israel onto New Testament believers, risking a new form of legalism.
The Normative Principle of Worship offers a more biblically balanced approach. It states that whatever is not forbidden in Scripture is permitted in worship, as long as it is wise, edifying, and does not violate the core principles of God’s Word. This approach honors the sufficiency of Scripture without turning it into an exhaustive rulebook for every detail. It allows for cultural expression and creative elements consistent with the gospel, recognizing that God, through the progressive revelation of His plan, has brought us from the shadows of the Old Covenant into the glorious freedom of the New.
Discover more from Biblical Christian Missionary
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.