The Implications of Sola Scriptura for Life and Practice
Why are there thousands of different Christian denominations? Why do some churches have self proclaimed apostles, others one lead pastor, while others are led by a group of elders? How can one church forbid something that another church encourages, with both claiming to follow the Bible? The answer to these complex questions often comes down to one foundational principle: how we view the authority of Scripture.
The principle of Sola Scriptura, Latin for “Scripture alone,” stands as the foundational conviction of the Protestant Reformation. More than just a historical slogan, it asserts that the Holy Bible is the supreme, final, and sufficient authority for all matters of Christian faith and life. This principle acts as a crucial boundary, a two-sided guardrail cautioning us not only to avoid adding to Scripture but also to avoid subtracting from it or limiting what it plainly says. The Apostle Paul himself gives a clear warning that encapsulates this idea, urging believers in a divided church not to “go beyond what is written” (1 Corinthians 4:6). When this foundational principle is violated, significant problems arise, creating a faith burdened by human invention rather than divine revelation.
The Danger of Going Beyond Scripture
The command to not “go beyond what is written” is fundamentally a guard against human pride elevating its own ideas to the level of divine command. Jesus powerfully confronted this very error in the religious leaders of his day. He rebuked the Pharisees for nullifying the Word of God for the sake of their man-made rules, such as their traditions that allowed a man to declare his property as a gift to God (“Corban”) to avoid his duty to care for his aging parents. Jesus declared, “You leave the commandment of God and hold to the tradition of men” (Mark 7:8). Similarly, Paul’s entire letter to the Galatians is a passionate defense against those who went beyond the written gospel, adding the requirement of circumcision to the simple truth of salvation by grace through faith.
Avoiding these errors requires us to embrace a foundational principle of interpretation: while the whole Bible is for us, not all of it is directly to us. This is where a proper hermeneutic—a sound method of biblical interpretation—becomes essential. It includes understanding the overarching narrative of the biblical covenants to understand the difference between the old covenant law given to national Israel and the New Covenant in Christ’s blood. It also involves the crucial skill of distinguishing between what is descriptive and what is prescriptive.
- Descriptive passages simply tell us what happened (e.g., the apostles casting lots in Acts 1). They record events but do not automatically command us to imitate every action.
- Prescriptive passages give us direct commands or timeless principles for the church (e.g., the qualifications for elders in 1 Timothy 3).
Confusing the two can lead to significant error. The implications of all these things are profound and require a diligent, humble commitment to knowing God’s Word well.
An Implication of Sola Scriptura: Biblical Church Leadership
One of the most significant implications of holding Scripture as our sole, perfect authority is how we structure the church itself. Adhering to the Bible’s blueprint for leadership protects the flock from unbiblical, man-made hierarchies and the abuses of power they can enable.
The Foundational Office: Apostle
A direct implication of not going beyond what is written is that we must recognize the office of apostle was unique, foundational, and temporary. The New Testament gives strict, unrepeatable qualifications:
- He had to be a physical eyewitness of the resurrected Jesus Christ (Acts 1:21-22; 1 Corinthians 9:1).
- He had to be directly commissioned by Christ Himself (Galatians 1:1).
Because no one today can meet these biblical criteria, the foundational office of the apostle has necessarily ceased. Paul himself seemed to confirm the closing of this office. In 1 Corinthians 15:8, after listing the resurrection appearances of Jesus, he concludes, “Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me.” He viewed his own apostolic calling as the final and exceptional case, effectively closing the list of those who could be foundational witnesses to the resurrection. Only false apostles exist today; do not listen to or follow them.
The Ongoing Offices and Functions
For the ongoing life of the church, the New Testament clearly outlines two repeating offices: Elders (also called Overseers or Pastors), who are the spiritual shepherds responsible for governing, teaching, and protecting the flock; and Deacons, who are leading servants managing the practical and physical needs of the church, a role modeled in Acts 6 to free the spiritual leaders for prayer and the ministry of the Word. An implication of Sola Scriptura is that these are the only two formal offices a church should recognize. A point-by-point look at Ephesians 4:11 makes a further distinction clear:
- Apostles and Prophets: The foundational offices of Apostle and New Testament Prophet (who laid doctrine, Ephesians 2:20) have ceased.
- Evangelists: This is a vital, ongoing function performed by a gifted person.
- Pastors and Teachers: This describes the primary function of an elder.
Another Implication: A Balanced View of Spiritual Gifts
A second major implication of Sola Scriptura is that we must not subtract from the Word. While this may be an uncomfortable topic for some, we must always choose God’s objective truth over our subjective preferences and feelings. This means we cannot explain away things the Bible affirms—such as spiritual gifts—simply because they are controversial or make us uncomfortable. This is evident in the debate between cessationists and continuationists.
The Cessationist Position
Cessationists believe that the “sign gifts” (like prophecy, healing, and tongues) fulfilled their purpose and ceased with the death of the last apostle. Their argument rests on several key points. First, they argue the primary purpose of these gifts was to authenticate the apostles and their new revelation before the New Testament was written. Once the biblical canon was complete, such authenticating signs were no longer needed. This is an argument from silence. Second, they point to church history, arguing that the testimony of early church fathers shows a significant decline in these gifts after the apostolic age. Their primary biblical text is 1 Corinthians 13:8-10, where they argue “the perfect” that comes and causes the gifts to cease is the completed canon of Scripture. We will examine that text in a moment.
The Continuationist Position
Continuationists believe that all spiritual gifts are available to the church throughout the entire church age. They argue that the burden of proof lies with those who claim the gifts have stopped, as the Bible contains no verse that explicitly declares their cessation. On the contrary, Scripture gives commands to the church to “earnestly desire the spiritual gifts, especially that you may prophesy” (1 Corinthians 14:1) without providing an expiration date. They also argue that the purpose of the gifts was not only for authentication but for the ongoing edification of the church (1 Corinthians 12:7), a need that has not ceased.
Examining the Key Text
The central dispute comes down to the interpretation of “the perfect” in 1 Corinthians 13. A sound exegesis—letting Scripture interpret Scripture—reveals a different conclusion than the cessationist one.
- “Face to Face” Knowledge: In verse 12, Paul defines the “perfect” state as seeing “face to face,” a biblical term for a direct encounter with God at Christ’s return.
- “Knowing Fully”: He also defines it as knowing “fully, even as I have been fully known,” a state only possible in eternity.
The clear implication is that “the perfect” refers to Christ’s return, meaning the gifts are for the entire church age. This biblical truth, however, does not mean we should expect a constant display of miracles. A careful reading of the entire biblical timeline shows that spectacular, public miracles are exceptionally rare, not common. They tend to appear in distinct clusters during pivotal moments in redemptive history, with sometimes hundreds of years of relative silence between them. The three main periods of such activity were the time of Moses and the Exodus, the ministry of Elijah and Elisha, and the life of Christ and the apostles. In these eras, their primary purpose was to serve as confirming signs, authenticating God’s message and His chosen messengers. This biblical pattern strongly suggests that such signs, if they they were to occur today, are most likely to occur where the Gospel is penetrating for the first time, providing a balance against the unbiblical expectation that miracles should be an “every Sunday” occurrence.
The Personal Implication: Living Under the Word
The ultimate implication of believing God’s Word is perfect and authoritative is that it must govern our entire perspective on life. We are called to interpret our life and experiences through the lens of Scripture, not interpret Scripture through the lens of our limited life and experiences. The latter approach makes our subjective experience the standard for truth. The biblical mindset, however, does the opposite. It holds that the experience of one person must be submitted to the bigger picture of God’s objective, unchanging truth.
A clear example is the gift of tongues. The Bible defines it as speaking a real, human language for the gospel (Acts 2:6-11). This biblical definition stands in stark contrast to the incoherent babble often seen today. The presence of these counterfeits, however, does not nullify the genuine. To dismiss the true because of the false is a logical fallacy. It is like saying that because counterfeit money exists, real money must be a myth. The Bible itself warns of false prophets and misleading signs. Therefore, the biblical response, an implication of our trust in the Word, is not rejection but careful discernment. We are commanded to “test the spirits to see whether they are from God” (1 John 4:1). This calls us to a practical, three-fold response:
- Commit to Personal Study. The first and most important line of defense against error is a personal, working knowledge of God’s Word. We cannot outsource our understanding of Scripture. A Christian who does not read the Bible for themselves is vulnerable to deception.
- Test All Teaching. We must adopt the noble attitude of the Bereans in Acts 17:11, who “received the word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so.” This is not a sign of disrespect, but of spiritual maturity. Listen to sermons and read books with an open Bible, evaluating every claim against the whole counsel of God’s Word.
- Choose a Bible-Centered Church. Discernment is not just an individual task; it is also communal. We must belong to a local church where the leadership clearly models submission to the authority of Scripture and encourages the congregation to test their teachings. A healthy church provides a vital safeguard against personal error and doctrinal drift.
Conclusion: The Necessary Path of Sola Scriptura
If we truly believe in Sola Scriptura, our journey is never over. This belief gives rise to the Reformation principle of Ecclesia reformata, semper reformanda secundum verbum Dei—”the church reformed, always reforming according to the Word of God.” This implies a humble commitment to continually examine our beliefs. It means we must always go with the truth of God’s Word over our personal preferences and feelings. Our traditions, our comfort, and what seems normal to us must all yield to what the text actually says as we learn to rightly divide the Word of God (2 Timothy 2:15).
This posture leads to a position that some might described as a “cautious continuationist.” This view holds that we cannot limit what Scripture says is available to the church, so we believe the gifts continue because the Bible never says they have ceased, and to say they have would be saying something beyond what is written. However, we must also obey Scripture’s commands to test everything, reject what is false, and exercise all things in an orderly, biblically-prescribed manner. It is a position that is open to the work of the Spirit but not gullible in any way.
Ultimately, God’s Word is perfect. If we come to a conclusion that is beyond what is written—either by adding to it or subtracting from it—the error is in our view, not in the Scriptures. The final implication of Sola Scriptura is that our goal must always be to align our beliefs with His unchanging Word. Sola Scriptura is not a doctrine designed for argumentation, but for assurance. It frees the believer from the shifting sands of human opinion and the crushing weight of man-made rules. It invites us to find our rest not in our own experiences or in the traditions of men, but in the sufficient, clear, and unchanging Word of God Himself.
Ask Yourself:
- How does the distinction between what is descriptive and prescriptive change how you read a book like Acts?
- In what areas of your own life have you been tempted to interpret Scripture through your experience, rather than your experience through Scripture?
- After reading the arguments, what practical steps can you take to be a “cautious” and discerning believer in your own church context?
- What makes the principle of Semper Reformanda (“always reforming”) both challenging and freeing for a Christian?
For Further Study:
- On Biblical Interpretation & Preaching: The Christ-Centered Expositor by Tony Merida
- New Testament Church Dynamics: Help for Bi-Vocational, House Church, and Small-Church Pastors Drawn from Early Church Practice by Stephen E. Atkerson
- On Spiritual Gifts: Showing the Spirit: A Theological Exposition of 1 Corinthians 12-14 by D.A. Carson
- On Church Leadership: Biblical Eldership: An Urgent Call to Restore Biblical Church Leadership by Alexander Strauch
- On the Authority of Scripture: The Final Word by John MacArthur
Discover more from Biblical Christian Missionary
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.